Yeah, that's right, it is Nikon Adobe 1998 (I used to assume it is similar to just plain Adobe 1998 RGB). For an archival purposes I just keep the original format (i.e. Nikon Adobe 1998) and do not bother of converting one to a regular Adobe 1998. If I'll reveal later the need for such, I can do it any time.
Once I need to convert to sRGB I do it as almost the final step - just prior to comressing and saving as JPEG. Alex --- Ed Verkaik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Alex Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Once begining my scanning experience I set scanner's output format as > Adobe 98 RGB, do all the necessary editing in PS7, and save for an > archive as Adobe 98 RGB either. > > > > Ok, but the files are tagged "Nikon Adobe 1998" out of the scanner. > Do > you leave that as is or convert to the standard "Adobe RGB 1998" ... > and > why? I guess they're meant to be similar, but I wonder if there's > any > harm "converting" the profile to the standard Adobe one? > > Am I right in assuming that the profile conversion should be done > before > any PS editing, or (in the case above) does it matter? > > Ed Verkaik > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe > filmscanners' > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message > title or body __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
