On 9/8/04 4:32 PM, "Brad Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Were it up to me, and it isn't, so this is just a preference, I would have
> it cover digital photography from acquisition to printing.

I have not been a conspicuous presence on this list, mostly lurking for a
couple of years.  I have learned a lot from the good people here, and
perhaps contributed a few meager tidbits of info from my own experience.  I
hope the list does not die.

But I want to voice a cautionary reaction to Brad's suggestion.  For me, the
best mailing lists are those that address a narrow topic, and stay focused
on that topic.  This means that I don't have to wade through a lot of
articles to find the few that I want to read.  Digital photography is a
rather broad field, and could encompass scanning, digicams, photoediting,
color management, printing, imaging for the web, business and employment
issues, etc.  Some of those subfields interest me, some do not.  I would
hate to see this group evolve into a high volume list covering a diffuse
range of topics.  I would rather subscribe to a small set of focused lists
that cover the subfields I follow.  That's what I am doing now.

--
Julian Vrieslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body

Reply via email to