On 09/06/2007 James L. Sims wrote: > I think that digital imaging definitely has a place in this list, > Tony. > I have confidence in and great respect for the core group of this > list. > Digital imaging, film scanning and digicams are still evolving. Just > some of the issues are RAW file converters, practical limits of pixel > density - have we reached it? How much do we really need? And the > digital archiving issues, just to name a few. I think you have a blue > ribbon group contained in this list, Tony. > > Please keep it going,
I am amazed to see it leap back into life, it saves me worrying that the server has clagged:) I'm happy to let it mutate to accomodate changed conditions, though I wouldn't want to see it become a minor and pointless clone of [prodig]. -- Regards Tony Sleep http://tonysleep.co.uk ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
