But a pixel is around 6um on a side, so grain is finer than a pixel. R. Jackson wrote: > On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Arthur Entlich wrote: > <snip> Look here: > > http://www.imx.nl/photosite/technical/Filmbasics/filmbasics.html > > See the 400x magnification? If that level of capture detail existed > in your film scans and you had no issues with aliasing I think it > would be pretty significant. The files will be enormous, though, and > you'd have to really enjoy the artifacts of the medium to even > bother. I'd bother, though. I imagine it will be another decade > before that kind of technology is accessible to people for fine arts > use in any practical sense, but I'll be at the head of the line. > > -Rob > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
