I also think it is not correct to simply use jpeg fine with 'no sharpening' for the comparison, as the defaults in each camera could well be different. Some sharpening is likely to be applied in camera to a jpeg even if switched to zero sharpening.
He explained away the fact that he could not do a raw test comparison by the fact that he could not find a raw converter that would do both formats, possibly the case a couple of years ago when he did that test, but I would have imagined PS could have done it with both plugins. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Geoghegan Sent: Thursday, 12 July 2007 2:21 AM To: Hanna, Mark (x9085) Subject: [filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography Yes, there are all sorts of ways to define the perfect comparison test depending on what's most relevant to the way each of us would use the gear, let alone a "perfect" lab evaluation. Rørslett is a reliable source but he's working with his own requirements & tastes -- a cold weather nature photographer fond of long lenses. Bob G -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 9:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography I wish they were a bit more scientific in their analysis. For instance, Canon makes more than one 300mm lens. Bob Geoghegan wrote: > Hmmm, 12 MP but in different sizes. Consider the Nikon D2X(s) vs Canon 1D > mkII or 5D. > http://www.naturfotograf.com/D2X_rev00.html > http://www.naturfotograf.com/D2X_rev06.html#top_page > > Results may vary, of course. > Bob G ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body Notice This email, and any attachments transmitted with it, is confidential and may contain sensitive or privileged information. If you are not the named recipient you may not read, use, copy, disclose, distribute or otherwise act in reliance of the message or any of the information it contains. If you have received the message in error, please inform the sender via email and destroy the message. Opinions expressed in this communication are those of the sender and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Crown Castle Australia Pty Ltd. No responsibility is taken for any loss or damage sustained from the use of the information in this email and Crown Castle Australia Pty Ltd makes no warranty that this material is unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body