I've tried everything, using the info below to unsubscribe, going to the
website and still I've been getting more than 10 emails/day from you!!

If you have ANY of these addresses as subscription addresses:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Maybe you'll hear this....

UNFUCKINGSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!



> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:13:01 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Finale digest, Vol 1 #6 - 3 msgs
> 
> Send Finale mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Finale digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
> 1. Re: Re: Thoughts on Mac-Sibelius 2.0 (David W. Fenton)
> 2. Re: filter out those hude digests! (Dennis Bathory-Kitsz)
> 3. Re: filter out those hude digests! (David W. Fenton)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:42:37 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Re: Thoughts on Mac-Sibelius 2.0
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> On 17 Apr 2002, at 18:06, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> 
>> On 17.04.2002 16:59 Uhr, Robert Patterson wrote
>> 
>>> One element in this thread that puzzles me is the view that plugins are
>>> somehow
>>> "not part of" the program. Plugins are no less a part of Finale than they
>>> are
>>> of
>>> Protools or Photoshop. Some of them are incredibly useful. Indeed, it is
>>> only
>>> because of plugins that my efficiency has risen so much. And why should Coda
>>> waste resources implementing something that is already well-addressed by a
>>> plugin? Anyone reluctant to use plugins must love drudgery.
>> 
>> And, in the specific case of Beams (ie the functionality of Patterson
>> Beams), I would argue that a plugin beats any other approach, as it allows
>> for by far the most flexibility and variation of individual beam settings
>> without becoming in the way of efficient working (building all these
>> functions into the program as beaming options would almost certainly slow
>> the whole application down so much it would be unusable on anything but the
>> fastest machine).
>> 
>> So thank you for that one, Robert, it really makes Finale unbeatable for
>> beams.
> 
> I don't know if Finale's default beaming algorithm has been given any
> intelligence recently (I'm still running WinFin97, upgrading soon,
> though). The old algorithm set the slope based on the first and last note
> of the beamed group, which is a very, very stupid and brain-dead way to
> do it. Perhaps that was justified in the old days when CPU power was
> limited (say, the early 90s), but today, there's no excuse.
> 
> Has Finale's default beaming improved? Is it still using only the first
> and last beam of the group for calculating the angle?
> 
> If so, then I think it really ought to be fixed IN THE PROGRAM ITSELF. A
> plugin should be required only for exceptional cases, not for every
> measure of a piece with beams.
> 
> -- 
> David W. Fenton                         |        http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
> David Fenton Associates                 |        http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:04:07 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Finale] filter out those hude digests!
> 
> At 08:36 PM 4/17/02 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
>> I hate to keep harping on my email reader
> 
> My only reason for suggesting the use of an interface like mail2web.com is
> that it obviates the need to change email clients for a temporary situation
> like this one. I have mail in Eudora mailboxes since 1994, and I like the
> way it works. I don't care to dump or convert 264MB worth of messages, and
> I'm sure some others find their clients familiar.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 3
> From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:12:23 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Finale] filter out those hude digests!
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> On 17 Apr 2002, at 21:04, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> 
>> At 08:36 PM 4/17/02 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
>>> I hate to keep harping on my email reader
>> 
>> My only reason for suggesting the use of an interface like mail2web.com is
>> that it obviates the need to change email clients for a temporary situation
>> like this one. I have mail in Eudora mailboxes since 1994, and I like the
>> way it works. I don't care to dump or convert 264MB worth of messages, and
>> I'm sure some others find their clients familiar.
> 
> Pegasus Mail supports UNIX-format mailboxes, which means you can always
> convert to any email client that supports them.
> 
> -- 
> David W. Fenton                         |        http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
> David Fenton Associates                 |        http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 
> 
> End of Finale Digest

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to