I've tried everything, using the info below to unsubscribe, going to the website and still I've been getting more than 10 emails/day from you!!
If you have ANY of these addresses as subscription addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe you'll hear this.... UNFUCKINGSUBSCRIBE ME!!!! > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:13:01 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Finale digest, Vol 1 #6 - 3 msgs > > Send Finale mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Finale digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Re: Thoughts on Mac-Sibelius 2.0 (David W. Fenton) > 2. Re: filter out those hude digests! (Dennis Bathory-Kitsz) > 3. Re: filter out those hude digests! (David W. Fenton) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:42:37 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Finale] Re: Thoughts on Mac-Sibelius 2.0 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 17 Apr 2002, at 18:06, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > >> On 17.04.2002 16:59 Uhr, Robert Patterson wrote >> >>> One element in this thread that puzzles me is the view that plugins are >>> somehow >>> "not part of" the program. Plugins are no less a part of Finale than they >>> are >>> of >>> Protools or Photoshop. Some of them are incredibly useful. Indeed, it is >>> only >>> because of plugins that my efficiency has risen so much. And why should Coda >>> waste resources implementing something that is already well-addressed by a >>> plugin? Anyone reluctant to use plugins must love drudgery. >> >> And, in the specific case of Beams (ie the functionality of Patterson >> Beams), I would argue that a plugin beats any other approach, as it allows >> for by far the most flexibility and variation of individual beam settings >> without becoming in the way of efficient working (building all these >> functions into the program as beaming options would almost certainly slow >> the whole application down so much it would be unusable on anything but the >> fastest machine). >> >> So thank you for that one, Robert, it really makes Finale unbeatable for >> beams. > > I don't know if Finale's default beaming algorithm has been given any > intelligence recently (I'm still running WinFin97, upgrading soon, > though). The old algorithm set the slope based on the first and last note > of the beamed group, which is a very, very stupid and brain-dead way to > do it. Perhaps that was justified in the old days when CPU power was > limited (say, the early 90s), but today, there's no excuse. > > Has Finale's default beaming improved? Is it still using only the first > and last beam of the group for calculating the angle? > > If so, then I think it really ought to be fixed IN THE PROGRAM ITSELF. A > plugin should be required only for exceptional cases, not for every > measure of a piece with beams. > > -- > David W. Fenton | http://www.bway.net/~dfenton > David Fenton Associates | http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:04:07 -0400 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Finale] filter out those hude digests! > > At 08:36 PM 4/17/02 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote: >> I hate to keep harping on my email reader > > My only reason for suggesting the use of an interface like mail2web.com is > that it obviates the need to change email clients for a temporary situation > like this one. I have mail in Eudora mailboxes since 1994, and I like the > way it works. I don't care to dump or convert 264MB worth of messages, and > I'm sure some others find their clients familiar. > > Dennis > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:12:23 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Finale] filter out those hude digests! > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 17 Apr 2002, at 21:04, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: > >> At 08:36 PM 4/17/02 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote: >>> I hate to keep harping on my email reader >> >> My only reason for suggesting the use of an interface like mail2web.com is >> that it obviates the need to change email clients for a temporary situation >> like this one. I have mail in Eudora mailboxes since 1994, and I like the >> way it works. I don't care to dump or convert 264MB worth of messages, and >> I'm sure some others find their clients familiar. > > Pegasus Mail supports UNIX-format mailboxes, which means you can always > convert to any email client that supports them. > > -- > David W. Fenton | http://www.bway.net/~dfenton > David Fenton Associates | http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > > End of Finale Digest _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
