I don't read German, so I have no clue what it says, but I think it is safe to say that whatever a corporation states in March of 2001 is not to be taken seriously in April of 2002.
Johannes Gebauer wrote: > On 29.04.2002 22:31 Uhr, Jari Williamsson wrote > > >>Johannes Gebauer writes: >> >> >>>Well, Henle has not _moved_ to Finale, even if Coda claims this. Henle uses >>>a variety of software solutions, among them also Finale. To my knowledge >>>they also use their own system, called Amadeus, although it seems that this >>>is no longer being developed and not freely available any more. It was Unix >>>based as far as I remember. >>> >>So, is this quote true or untrue? >>[Recently at Musik Messe in Frankfurt, Dr. Norbert Gertsch, editor >>at G. Henle Verlag, demonstrated that Finale is used for all of >>their new production. This publisher, who created the "Urtext," >>appreciates Finale's abilities and its commitment to their future >>development.] >> > > Ah, well that's new to me. In that case they must have changed their > pilosophy, as this is what they wrote to me: > > >>So kann man mit Ihren Hilfestellungen >>keineswegs ein auch nur annähernd vergleichbares Henle-Notenbild >>produzieren; dieser Eindruck könnte aber entstehen. So könnte man meinen, >>wir (der Henle Verlag) benutze Finale-Software, was nur zu einem Bruchteil >>für die bisher publizierten Titel zutrifft. >> > > (I hope you read German...). This was on 28th March 2001. > > Johannes > -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
