i am several days behind on reading, maybe this has already been suggested, but...
>From: "Jari Williamsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >If others have additions or want to vote for the same feature request as you're >sending in, those persons should also send the request to Coda themselves. Otherwise >they will not be registered as separate votes. what if the wish list was compiled on the finale list and sent to coda as a submission which represents an international group of finale users, who are in agreement with the needs or concerns or implementation desires contained in the list? how many people are on this list? it might be a stronger way to suggest or request changes. i think it is extremely inefficient to censor requests because coda is "unlikely to do it", or because it is difficult to implement etc. if it is a real need by users, the request should be included in the list no matter how complex or "unrealistic" it may seem. perhaps several possibilities can be suggested for [seemingly] more complex requests, in order from utopic to acceptable. the requests should not be in order of "importance", since attempting to do so on this list would certainly never come to concensus. where large lack of consensus occurs [not uncommon here], those requests could be in a separate section of the document, or submitted by the various factions individually. jef -- shirling & neueweise \................/ new music notation specialists mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com ++ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
