I never played around with it. Whenever I needed one number only (between the staves) I chose the option of not displaying anything and I just added it at the end of all formatting by means of a measure expression by hand. Yes, it is extra work, but it is better in the end than trying to guess the height of the number and then kicking yourself in the leg once you get around to individually spacing the staves of that group, to find that the "center" moves around in every case.
----- Original Message ----- From: Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Finale list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question > On 12.02.2003 13:51 Uhr, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote > > > Finale 2001d Windows: > > > > Create an opaque expression which consists only of an enclosed rectangle > > with a line thickness of "0". Make sure to connect this expression to a note > > which is in a frame which comes *after* the multimeasure rest, otherwise the > > number will not get covered. Place this expression on the multimeasure rest > > number in question. > > It's an idea. I now wonder, however, whether the number should in fact be on > both staves anyway. Or should it be in between the staves? > > Johannes > -- > http://www.musikmanufaktur.com > http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
