On the topic of composers compromising on notation, I'm new to
hands-on use of Finale, having worked only with the other programs until this
month, and I'm wondering about the surprising standardization by Coda of the 8vb
symbol.
Looking through all the music I own from all different style
periods and countries prior to 1985 or so, 8----- is by far the most common
notation for an octave below, and I also find a little bit of 8va, 8b, 8vaba,
8ba, and 8vb which was very uncommon prior to Finale. So far I haven't
found anything other than 8--- prior to 1945, though I realize it must be out
there. Clearly when engravers, composers, and copyists had the easy
freedom to indicate the octave-down symbol however they wanted through hand
copying or free typesetting or ordering metal tools, 8vb was almost unknown
(with a few exceptions). Now with the ease of the Smart Shape 8vb, it is
automatic to use this Finale-standard.
So composers who urge for the more traditional 8--- (or 8ba
which I personally like in my own music) instead need to slug their way through
it. How do I honor this composer preference?
I wonder what the rest of you have done about this? Does
everybody suddenly genuinely prefer 8vb (oddly taking the v from the middle of
octava, unlike the logical va which ends the word), or are there workarounds I
haven't discovered yet, and which apparently aren't creeping into use? Or is
this 8vb something we just accept against our preference?
Thanks for any advice on this :-)
|
- RE: [Finale] 8vb Daniel Dorff
- RE: [Finale] 8vb Ronald M. Krentzman
- Re: [Finale] 8vb Daniel Dorff
- Re: [Finale] 8vb Richard Yates
- Re: [Finale] 8vb Christopher BJ Smith
- RE: [Finale] 8vb Fisher, Allen