Mark D. Lew wrote:
Same goes for those who kvetch about pronouncing "nuclear" like "nucular".
There's a logical explanation for "nucular"? If it truly exists, I would love to hear it.
About as logical as "aisle" (I'll) and "sword" (sord), except that those two are correct, and "noocular" isn't, for no apparent reason, except that it is English.
Christopher
(who mispronounced both until about the age of eleven because he had never heard them pronounced aloud, and who still insists on "TROMbone" instead of the overwhelmingly popular "tr'mBONE", and whose ten-year old daughter giggles at him because he says "robutt" where she says "robaht" for "robot".)
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
