Have you tried to tell automated Sprint "what the problem is" _Sometimes_, that even works. Also, of course, tuners have become pretty discriminating. The difference between all of these applications and a notation program, though, is rhythm. Placing all of this in exact relation to meter is a whole 'nother story.
----- Original Message ----- From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [Finale] comparing finale/sibelius > On 9 Feb 2004 at 18:17, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote: > > > > I do notice nobody has jumped in to defend Micnotator at all. :) > > > > > > David H. Bailey > > > > Ha! It's enough to try to develop error-free voice activated macros! > > Even that is basically impossible. Or have the technologies changed > > since about two years ago, when I tried this? Anybody using those? > > Well, certain companies manage to make it work with their automated > telephone service lines, so it's obviously doable to a certain > degree. While phones are rather low fidelity, the menus where it is > used are also very limited (e.g., they only have to distinguish "Yes" > from "No"). I also know several lawyers who do all their brief > writing with voice recognition and have secretaries clean it up, and > they've been doing this for several years. > > -- > David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton > David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
