Coming as I do mostly from the band world, I say, party on, dude! Key signatures are the standard for band literature, and also for school-orchestra music as well. It is only the vast world of reprints of older editions (i.e. Luck's and Kalmus) in the orchestral world that continues to keep the non-key signature tradition alive. Horn players who choose to enter the professional world these days certainly need to be well-versed in both types of parts. I don't recall ever seeing a brass ensemble horn part that lacked key signature (other than music which put the horn part in the key of C major or a minor).

Since we can't change the huge number of key-signature-less orchestral music, we can't completely eliminate such literature, but I agree that horn players should be able to read key signatures easily.

My advice would be to include key signatures in your parts as you feel best fits the situation.

David H. Bailey



Harold Owen wrote:

Dear folks,

Knowing that many will disagree with me, but IMHO I think it's time for horn players to get used to reading key signatures in their parts. Younger players are more likely to find signatures often enough to be comfortable with them. The "old pros" should get with it and learn to play from parts with signatures. If that's difficult for them, let them mark the accidentals in their parts. Why should they be treated differently from the other members of the brass family? Much of my own music does not use signatures for any parts because they tend to get in the way when the tonal focus is weak or changes often. However, some of my pieces have a strong enough tonal focus that signatures are helpful -- actually mean something. In those pieces that involve horn parts, I will give them signatures.

What say you?

Hal

-- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to