On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:31:48 -0500, "Aaron Sherber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > At 03:14 AM 3/17/2004, Mark D Lew wrote: > >When you drag an articulation on a cross-staff note, the display > >routine during the dragging doesn't take the cross-staff into account > >properly, so during the drag (or nudge) you are in non-wysiwyg mode. > >The adjustment you make to the articulation is nevertheless applied > >correctly to the true position of the articulation. > > Well, then it's gotten worse in 2004. In order to get the artic to move > down, I have to drag it up, and vice versa.
Apologies if this has been mentioned before, but if you do a lot of cross staff notation, it's worth having alternate articulations handy, defined as metatools, which take this into account. That is, if you normally place on the note side, then duplicate the articulation and have it placed stem side. I have the metatools for stem side artics programmed below the 'regular' ones on my computer keyboard, which makes it relatively painless. Am I correct in assuming this has not been fixed in 2004? (I'm on 2003) If so, that would strike me as an immense oversight. BTW, how much better is the auto-cross staff function in 2004 than the one currently available in TGTools. Does the beam need adjusting, and so on. Can it handle auto crossing- e.g. every second note in the bottom staff, and so on? Is feathered beaming supported for cross staff notation in 2004? David _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
