On 24 Aug 2004 at 19:37, Darcy James Argue wrote: > On 24 Aug 2004, at 02:59 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: > > > On 24 Aug 2004 at 14:52, Darcy James Argue wrote: > > > >> Actually what it sounds like is that the Windows Bluetooth > >> implementation is really, really lousy. > > > > What the hell does Bluetooth have to do with it? Neither WiFi or the > > MS cordless mouse run on Bluetooth. > > Actually, *this* Microsoft cordless mouse uses Bluetooth. I thought > that's the one you were talking about. > > <http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ > productdetails.aspx?pid=001>
Yes, and that's not what my clients had -- they had the non-Bluetooth wireless mouse (which is cheaper, for one thing). Perhaps a Bluetooth one would not have been a problem -- I don't know. > Anyway, Chris Smith (who you were replying to) is a Mac user. If he > were to get a wireless mouse, it would probably be a Bluetooth one, > because Bluetooth is standard on Macs -- and, as I said, integrated > quite nicely into the OS. I was reporting real-life experiences with a wireless mouse, but as everyone should know by now, I don't have anything to do with Macs. Either the information I post is applicable to Mac users or its not. Details of Bluetooth or not really have nothing to do with it -- it it's a problem in one configuration it could potentially be an issue in any configuration, on any OS. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
