At 09:12 PM 1/21/05 -0800, Stephen Onwood wrote: > At 09:55 PM 1/20/2005, you wrote: > >> I spent sometime to do more testing, and my original report was >> Since I am not used to doing this on Windows side, I didn't >> I >> The result was much better than I initially had: >> <http://www.a-no-ne.com/pdfTest/> > > I took the time to compare these two files closely at various >magnifications from 100% to1600%. > The mac file looks great at all magnifications while the win file is >awful. What is interesting is that the line including stems and leger lines > At higher magnifications this waviness remains and it doesn't taper to >a fine point as it does inthe mac file (1600%).
Using Reader 5 on Win98, both files look almost identical (except for the title fonts) -- and neither is any better than what I've been creating & seeing in other files. Reader smoothing off. The only graphical difference I can see is that the stems and barlines on the Windows version are offset to the left by about 1/2 stem. The tie curves are identical to the pixel on my screen. In this recent discussion, I have not seen the crosshatching or multiple lines on Reader 5, which I used to see in Reader 4. (The other) Dennis _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
