Mark D Lew wrote:
I do of course realize that, in spite of its name, the glyph is the equivalent of a double s, not an s and a z.

I don't think this is right, a handwritten "z" in old German handwriting looks like a "3" with a sling, and I am pretty sure this is where it comes from. A combination of "ss" at the end of a word would look quite differently, and a middle of the word "ss" would look like "ff" to non-Germans.


The difference of the two "s" characters is not a long and short one, btw, it merely depends whether it is the end of a word or the middle.

Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to