On Feb 22, 2005, at 11:24 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
I see no one in this discussion making any attempt whatsoever to dissuade you or Crystal or anyone else from their personal esthetic reactions to art -- all the disputation has been entirely on non- esthetic issues.
And some of the non-esthetic issues are extremely interesting! For example, the fact that the artist manages to pay for the ENTIRE humongous work himself fascinates me. What a fantastic example for other artists! And the nature of the installation itself - quite a bit more subtle than huge photos of naked crowds, can't ignore it very easily just the same, huge reactions from everyone either hating it or loving it, discussions about the nature of art and what this particular work means...
Hold on a minute, I just realised something. Christo - Crystal, it's all a little too convenient, isn't it? She(he) comes innocently into our little list, seeding discussions and increasing the publicity of the work – they must be the same person! Has anyone ever seen them both in the same room at the same time? OK, Christo or Crystal or whatever you want to call yourself, we're on to you!
8-)=) (enormous toothy grin)
Christopher
(Wait a minute – Christo/Christopher, has anyone ever seen ME in the same room with him? I could be him, too! Or for that matter, I could even be Crystal. Man, is my wife going to be upset.)
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
