daniel, dennis, certainly you are free to submit a request of your own. i don't expect everyone to agree entirely with me, but if we waited for us all to agree, nothing would ever get submitted to the developers, let alone fixed.
i'm also not of the opinion that any recent upgrade has been "sufficient", though i willingly admit that some were "important". despite two updates, one of which was supposed to have fixed wonky behaviour in the tuplet tool, the otherwise impressive improvements to that tool will probably still be functioning in a half-ass, faulty manner when 2006 comes out... and the programme will probably still be sluggish... and there will probably still not be EPS in PC... and... and... and... and most of us will fork out the dough anyways... and we will probably have a slew of new background themes to choose from (oh YAY!)... <heaving sigh>
dennis, it seems to me that people mention broken EPS quite often...
regards, jef
From: Daniel Wolf
It's a nice list, but I think that getting compact and reliable PS, EPS, and PDF output would be sufficient for one year's upgrade.
From: "d. collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can only agree. I'm not in favor of requesting any new bells and whistles as long as such important features are broken (EPS export AND import, which no one mentions).
--
shirling & neueweise \................/ new music notation specialists mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
