On 10 Apr 2005 at 18:35, Carl Dershem wrote:

> David W. Fenton wrote:
> 
> > I wouldn't refer to that as "spiritual," just non-rational, 
> > unconscious, and, because of that, somewhat mysterious and 
> > inexplicable.
> > 
> > But "spiritual", well, I *spit* on that word -- it has nothing to do
> > with that.
> 
> Sounds as though we're getting into semantics here.  For many people
> the first paragraph above is what they mean by "Spiritual."

For me the term indicates something religious, whether or not 
involving a $deity, and that's what I reject.

The term also seems to me to be associated with the supernatural, and 
I don't see any of that in what I wrote. I certainly didn't *intend* 
anything supernatural by what I wrote.

-- 
David W. Fenton                        http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associates                http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to