On 6 Jun 2005 at 11:32, Chuck Israels wrote: [quoting me:] > > Have I mentioned recently how broken Finale's copying mechanisms > > are? > > I haven't heard anything about this lately, but I hope MM has been > paying attention to this for 2006. It's a major irritant for me, > even though I've become used to the vagaries of the system, as it is > now. This is the kind of thing for which I gladly pay the yearly > upgrade cost. I don't want to start another "Is is worth it?" > discussion here. Our personal economies vary, so the value of this > is relative. I'm just happy to have reached the point that I can > safely say that it's worth it to me.
If they fix all the copying errors, so that nothing breaks, that would be a real reason for even *me* to upgrade, though I won't be doing it until there's key escrow. In other words, fixing the copying would be enough of a productivity improvement that it would pay for itself, all by itself. There are very few such fixes/improvements that would have that same equation for me, personally. Other people's balance of cost/productivity will, of course, be different. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
