On 10 Jun 2005 at 13:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [quoting me:] > >Nor do I. I don't run full-time virus monitoring, because the benefit > >is not worth the CPU cycles it uses up. > > I hope you aren't passing the viruses along as the result of not > saying on top of this.
How, exactly, could I do that? I'm all ears. I know plenty of reasons why it's not possible at all, but I'd sure like to hear what you think could possibly be happening here. Free clue: AV software does not prevent you from infecting your computer, nor does it prevent you from passing them on. > >> In addition...historically, Apple machines have run more > >> efficiently on lower mhz machines vs. their PC > >> counterparts...(google it) though reports are somewhat subjective > >> and I prefer to not get into yet another Mac vs. PC war. I'll > >> stick with my own experience ("benchmark testing") thank you. > > > >In other words, you were talking out your ass. > > If you are saying that the many years of experience I have been > sitting in front of both PC's and Macs...reading and comparing specs > for both...running them both...etc. etc. counts for nothing and that > I have absolutely no idea what I am talking about, then yes, I am > talking out of my ass as you so tastefully put it. If you'd posted the paragraph beginning "In addition...historically" instead of nattering on about performance and benchmarks, I don't believe anyone would have responded as they did. *How* you say something is as important as what you're trying to say. Of course, I also think the meaning of the present version of your assertion is substantially more limited than that of your original. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale