RP>This issue of long-standing bugs being fixed points up a feature 
listed on the website that greets me with dismay. That is the "Studio View & 
Powerful Mixer" feature. Some on this list are already salivating at the 
thought, but for all its possible value, I believe it is a rueful step.

        

        I'd not label it "rueful" though I'd love to see all the existing bugs 
fixed...I'd consider this move to be expected and evolutionary.

        
        RP>That is because it is a step out of the notation world into the 
crowded sequencer market. If Finale tries to be all things, it will be none. MM 
is a tiny company. The introduction of sequencer features risks the possibility 
that most of their resources the next few years will be devoted to enhancing 
those. 

        That's what I'd call the evolutionary part of the move.  Competing 
products already have this.  The two technologies of notation and playback are 
merging.  (Notice that I call it "playback" and not "sequencing") The clients I 
have are becoming sophisticated enough to demand not only a printed score but 
also a better-than-GM mockup so they can peddle their wares. They have grown in 
sophistication, so must we, and so must the products we use.

        FWIW< I would have made this set of changes a while AGO, instead of  or 
BEFORE the Rhyming Dictionary and the auto-sorta-harmonizer

        RP>I am extremely concerned that we may have seen the virtual end of 
notation-related enhancements for a long while. The 2006 release already 
apparently provides essentially none, at least based on the new features list 
at the website.

        That's what I'd call the expected part of the move. The notation 
technology is MATURE--there simply isn't a great deal of advancement or 
enhancement left to do. As to bug fixes, a software vendor that squashes every 
single bug has nowhere to go, so much as I may hate it, I live with it

        RP>The new plugins look like they could be moderately nice, but plugins 
by definition cannot add new functionality. At their best, they automate the 
old functionality.

        If it makes my job easier, it's worth it to me, whether it is a new 
functionality or an automation of something old.  In my "other life," a 
spreadsheet merely automated tasks I'd been doing for years. Sure did make my 
life easier!!

        Conclusion: I had moved away from Finale and become very involved with 
a competing product, beyond just using it...this set of improvements will bring 
me back to Finale alongside the "competing product."

        As to notation, there is probably a "Bruno Bettelheim" phenomenon at 
work--there is a level of notation that is "good enough" for publication and 
performance.  While I may not love that, I can live with it to some extent 
without feeling compromised, and I'd say that all the notation products realize 
that to some extent or other.

        Just some random thoughts to stimulate discussion...

        Jim

        
         

<<winmail.dat>>

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to