On 06 Jul 2005, at 7:06 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Now, whether or not things like beam breakage and angle and other elements that are at some level purely "cosmetic" should be linked, I don't know. I can't think of a strong argument either way for beaming, though I think that, in particular, avoidance of wedges is going to be rather difficult if beam angle/position in transposing parts is linked between parts and a concert-pitch score. That is another of the arguments for why the functionality in Patterson Beams belongs as part of the basic beaming algorithms, and not as a plug-in that's applied to make adjustments to the data after entry.
That's a very good idea. I was wondering myself how to solve that particular problem, but if Finale just integrates Patterson Beams into the Beam Options, well, there's your solution right there.
- Darcy ----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
