On 11 Jul 2005 at 16:10, James Gilbert wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Gerry Kirk wrote:
> 
> > On several big band charts I have engraved recently, as I prepare
> > the score for printing I discover that at about page 8 the display
> > has changed size by about double. In other words, pp. 1-7 show as
> > being at 100% and all 19 staves fit on one page. Then from page 8 to
> > the end, all margins have changed, and notes display at double the
> > previous page’s size.
> 
> I've run across some similar situations myself. If you are starting
> with a template, make sure the page format is correct. I mean the
> Options->Score Format->Score menu option. I've designed a few
> templates in which I formatted several pages the way I wanted but
> forgot to change the score format in the above menu option. Whenever I
> got to a situation where I had more pages than the template, the new
> page (really the new systems) would default to whatever was in the
> score format option. Usually that was the wrong page size and wrong
> margins, etc.
> 
> My solution was to either correct the score format and redefine pages
> in the page layout tool or change the percentages as you had done.
> Starting with a template that is correct for future projects is
> probably easiest.

But even if you forget or don't change it in the template, you can 
still make the change in the existing file's default page layout, and 
then run the REDEFINE PAGES function (PAGELAYOUT | REDEFINE PAGES | 
SELECTED PAGES).

Another alternative is, in page layout view, to simply right click 
the selector box for a page or system layout that you want propagated 
through the rest of the file, choose EDIT MARGINS (which loads the 
settings for the selected page or system), and then change page range 
or system range to start with the currently selected sytem and end 
with a number like 9999 (to include all pages).

Note, however, that this will not propagate staff reductions unless 
they are for all systems (as defined in the files page layout 
defaults). If you have some systems at 100% and some at reduced 
percentages, you still have to reapply those manually, but since the 
default for that is to start from the system you select and apply 
your percentage to the end of the file, it's not too difficult.

But, this is definitely an area where Finale's flexibility (i.e., you 
have the capability of having any ad hoc page or system layout you 
want at any point in the file) makes it harder to do *normal* layout. 
This is an instance where Finale's design seems upside down to me, as 
it makes the exceptional case easier to do than the normal one.

On the other hand, Sibelius makes the exceptional case extremely 
hard. For most people, that isn't an issue at all, but when you need 
Finale's flexibility, it can be extremely frustrating.

-- 
David W. Fenton                        http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associates                http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc


_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to