On 12/07/05, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> (even though it may be called "private" by its owners, since anybody in
> the world is free to subscribe, with no qualifications to be met nor
> stipulations placed, the courts may view this as a public list)

I subscribe to a couple of other Mailman lists where, to subscribe,
your request for subscription is moderated. The list owner receives
the request and  sends out a questionnaire; it is only after
sufficient answers have been received that he will begin the
subscription.

Possibly Henry could set up something similar for our list. He could
even "flush out" all of the subscribers and require us all to
resubscribe in order to weed out the robots. I would suggest that an
appropriate questionnaire would include such questions as "What
version of Finale did you first use?" and "What version of Finale are
you currently using?" Though it is possible that the administrators of
the robots may have the capacity to subscribe manually (and thus
receive the questionnaire themselves), it is likely that certain
questions can be devised that will prove familiarity with Finale in
its present and past incarnations.

However, this will definitely not do anything about the issue of the
content currently available on the servers of these archive sites, and
legal action to remove said content may still be required. In any
case, creating a more comprehensive filter to membership might prevent
this from happening again.

-- 
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
my blog: http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com
Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7.

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to