Cool down, Man! I have as much right to voice my opinion as any other member of the list. I have been very active in other forums for the past several years, taking part in discussions and helping novices with their problems. Just because I'm new to this list serve does not classify me as a "lurker".
But whether I have a long and honorable record as an active Finale supporter still does not give you the right to judge me. And what's the "thread cop" nonsense you're spouting? That's nonsense. If I want to read about Sibelius there are lots of places I can go to find out about the latest and greatest of that product. But this list is labeled "Finale", not "Finale and any other competing product people care to promote." Ronald J Brown -----Original Message----- From: Darcy James Argue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 12, 2005 6:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Finale] Is this a Finale or Sibelius list? On 12 Jul 2005, at 6:10 PM, ronan wrote: > I must admit, I was surprised to see all the Sibelius notes on a Finale > site. It's sort of like having a site for Windows users and having it > taken > over by Mac users. Or GM taken over by Ford owners. I'm glad Sibelius > users > like their product and want to talk about it, but I am not interested > in > reading them either. Then don't. Seriously, what is the point of this thread? The Sibelius discussion was directly related to the future of Finale and the kind of features and approach we'd like to see Finale emulate. If that's not an appropriate topic for discussion, then what is? And why is it always the lurkers who never contribute solutions to Finale problems (or contribute to the discussion in any way whatsoever) who feel entitled to come out of the woodwork to complain about allegedly off-topic discussions? Who died and made you thread cop? - Darcy ----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
