On 7/20/05, Phil Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 7/20/2005 11:33 AM, John Howell wrote:
> 
>  >There's a three-part approach to this that works well with amateurs,
>  >and even with professionals.  First you teach the music, making sure
>  >that all the parts are solidly learned.  Then teach the choreography,
>  >during which they forget half the music.  Then reteach the music
>  >coordinated with the choreography.  It works just fine; you just have
>  >to know in advance that this is what you need to do.
> 
> I agree.  But . . .
> 
> Most amateurs (in my area) don't have enough time to actually "learn" the
> music, let alone, learn some additional choreography.
> 

Many years ago I was in a church choir where I was one of a tiny
handful of singers who could sightread.  I tried, and failed, to
convince the director to spend a bit of time teaching basic theory &
sightreading. Her reason for refusing?  Not enough time because we had
so much music to learn - it was only a few hymns, 1 psalm, and a motet
each week.  (We had a handful of mass settings, none difficult, some
congregational, and would often do the same one for many weeks in a
row.)

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to