--- "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2005 at 13:19, Tyler Turner wrote: > > > --- "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >From what I can see, HP is just not all that > useful > > > as anything but > > > aural proofing. If you really want to produce a > MIDI > > > performance from > > > Finale, you have to do it the old-fashioned way. > > > > It depends on the music. I've had some composers > think > > HP performances were real orchestral recordings. > This > > is the exception rather than the rule, but it does > > indicate that context is important. > > Well, for me, there are too many aspects of HP > changes over which I > have no control, and the defaults are unacceptable > (such as the > excessively portato performance of non-slurred > notes), so I have to > turn off large areas of HP features (e.g., note > length effects). This > is too bad, because I really like the slurs it > creates. > Yep. Your mileage will vary. If you end up using GPO, you'll probably like HP's slur interpretation. It's far better than anything that could be done earlier by just extending notes so that they overlap. It's not the VSL legato, but it's the second best thing on the market in any price range. Tyler __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
