All fine with me, but count me out of it. I doubt there are many
engravers who have extensive experience in both genres, I certainly haven't.
I think a _much_ better idea would be to do this separately. What I am
after is things like beam placement, and as I understand it that doesn't
matter much with handwritten jazz style.
I also don't actually want to test the engraver, I want to see the best
output of real engraving that the software can possibly produce.
Johannes
Darcy James Argue schrieb:
On 21 Jul 2005, at 5:46 PM, Carl Dershem wrote:
I'd think one page of that, one page of a relatively complex jazz
piece (perhaps something from Mantooth or Levy or Fedchock) and one
other piece in a third style. After all, you want to show the
flexibility of the program, rather than just one thing it can do well.
Nothing against Mantooth, Levy or Fedchock, but their work isn't
anything I'd call "relatively complex." If this is meant to be a
challenge for the engraver, I'd recommend recent works by people like
Maria Schneider, Jim McNeely, John Hollenbeck, Django Bates, etc.
[Of course, there are copyright issues to deal with... ]
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
