Tyler Turner wrote:


--- "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Of course, if men couldn't have sung it, it wouldn't
have been written for them, so, we can see that the issue of discrimination doesn't have anything to do with the determination of the validity of the "singing in the wrong range damages the voice" justification for the Texas rule in regard to countertenors
specifically.



Just to be sure, you're not suggesting that TMEA was
saying that a countertenor singing in the soprano
range would damage his voice, are you? We're all on
the same page that this wasn't their rationale, right?

Tyler

I think we all understand that the damaging the voices aspect was about the women singing tenor.

The ban on the countertenor is from the Texans' desire to be fair in their ban -- ERA and all that, don't you know -- if we bar the women from singing cross-gender parts, we have to bar the men also. Fair is fair.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to