On 11 Aug 2005 at 16:42, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > On 11/08/05, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It causes problems in one of two ways: > > > > 1. it either inconveniences the people who are paying attention to > > remove the extra address when replying, OR > > > > 2. it inconveniences the person lists in the Reply-To along with the > > list, by causing them to get two copies of those messages. > > That's not the whole picture. People who include the Reply-To can also > set the list not to send a duplicate message. . . .
No, the list setting only controls duplicated TO: and CC: addresses, and the problem is *not* a duplicate address -- it's the recipient address plus the list address. > . . . This can be problematic > in its own ways (as previously described), but I find this to be less > obnoxious than receiving duplicate messages. There isn't any subscriber setting that solves the problem. > However, I was on the digest for a while (when traffic was > unbelievably heavy), and I actually *liked* receiving replies to > myself as well as to the list. This way, I was able to see the answers > to specific questions immediately, without having to wait for a new > Digest or needing to visit the archive pages. Well, that's perhaps one justification for it, but it seems a not very compelling one to me. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
