On 09 Sep 2005, at 5:09 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I can't recall where I've read this, but I'm sure a search of Stone
or Read or Ross will support it -- the later note in the second
measure requires an accidental. The rule about accidentals working
throughout the measure only applies when there has been an actual
accidental placed in the measure. Since with tied notes, there
isn't an accidental placed in front of the tied note in the second
measure
[sigh]
David, I don't mean to get snippy, but for crying out loud, this is
*exactly what this entire thread has been about* -- situations where
there IS an accidental placed in front of the tied note in the second
measure (because the second measure begins a new system, or a new
page, etc).
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
