Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
[snip]>
I am just curious why is it the profit model is ok for publishers, or
orchestras,
or record labels, or video productions, or the record chains, that make
profits
from music that's in the public domain is somehow "OK." But when an editor
makes his case in court (and wins), he's seen as the Antichrist for
doing it?
[snip]
Not by me -- if some people can make money from the recording, then
others who had a hand in making the music available for the recording
should also be able to make money from it.
After all, they didn't have to use his edition, did they? They could
have hired some work-for-hire scholar to prepare the music for recording
in an edition that Hyperion then would control the rights to.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
