On 27 Apr 2006, at 22:58, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 27.04.2006 Jonathan Smith wrote:
You should stick with your tried and trusted 'long winded' method
like I have.
You would have already saved yourself time. I was pulled up for
suggesting this only a few digests back - but there you go, each
to his own method!
Finalescript - not that simple is it really guys?
That's just like saying, you can save time by not programming a
macro which will, once you got to work, save you more time than the
time you would have saved.
You were not pulled up for suggesting this, only the question at
the time was "how do you do it in Finalescript" and you replied
"don't use it", which didn't answer the question. You are now doing
exactly the same again.
If John can solve the problems he is having with Finalescript, he
might be able to save a lot of time in the future. Of course, he
could instead just save the time on finding the solution, but then
he will waste a lot more time in the future.
In this particular instance, it would seem that Finalescript doesn't
work for me. I can only assume that my printer is in some way
incompatible with the script. It does everything right except that it
doesn't print double-sided. I don't resent the time I've spent trying
to get it to work, but in the meantime I will, as Jonathan suggests,
stick with the old method.
My printer is a Minolta/QMS PagePro 9100 with Duplex.
John
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
