Ahh I see the contrails of a problem I flew many months back and never
was satisfied. I could never get the sound from FIN 2006 that I
received from FIN 2005. Of course, ( I now understand) FIN 2006 sets
up automatically to AU/VST and FIN 2005 doesn't even posses it.
The fact is AU/VST stinks in comparison.
Jerry
On 29-Sep-06, at 10:55 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Randolph Peters wrote:
I've been noticing that playback is slightly different when you use
MIDI as opposed to playing through the Native Instrument AU/VST.
I kept all the parameters the same, using the same instruments, same
reverb, same HP etc. GPO was loaded in AU for one case and in the
other, I used Garritan Studio connected via their inter-application
MIDI.
I think I like the MIDI version better. HP worked better and was more
noticeable (not always a good thing!). In one case the AU version
simply would not play this one string harmonic within a passage of
harmonics, but it played fine using MIDI. (I cannot figure out this
strange anomaly. I've erased the passage and reentered it several
times with the same result!)
I also notice that the amount of overlap between notes is a tiny bit
longer in the MIDI playback as opposed to AU/VST playback.
Yes, but in a way you're comparing apples and oranges, but at the very
least comparing Courtlands with Granny Smiths.
When you do your midi route, you're using the FULL GPO and the extra
capabilities built into Garritan Studio, whereas when you're using the
Finale AU/VST output, you're using a lighter version of the GPO stuff,
or even if you're using the same full GPO samples, the playback engine
is different.
I'm not at all surprised that you find the midi output routed through
GPO to be better.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Gerald Berg
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
