Probably the easiest option is the put in the rests as notes and then change 
the notehead symbols to rest symbols. If you care about playback, you can turn 
off the playback bit on the "rests" using the Frame Dialog box. If the rests 
are other than 64th rests, you may have to insert invisible tuplets as needed, 
so as to keep 4 beams at all times.

Depending on the rest pattern, it is sometimes possible lengthen the secondary 
beam stubs across the entire beam.

I have longed for local beam options, either in the beam tool or as a staff 
style option, but MM seems too busy with other priorities to consider it. But 
with linked parts, these kinds of workarounds are often not compatible with 
both score and part views, so we may see pressure build to address the more 
common ones.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ThomaStudios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 02:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Finale] Beaming over rests
> 
> I have a client who is writing a piece that contains quite a bit of  
> modern notation conventions.  In one instance, he has a series of  
> many 64th notes in one measure, with a few rests in the pattern.  He  
> wants all 4 beams showing over the rests so I can feather the beams.   
> But Finale 2K7Mac will only allow me to do this globally, which I  
> don't want to do.  I've looked at Patterson's and TGTools to help,  
> but to no avail.
> 
> Does anyone have any suggestions on the best was to accomplish this  
> look?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> J D  Thomas
> ThomaStudios
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 



_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to