Every time I see Tom Johnson (from MM) at the IAJE convention, I see him use Simple entry, and he puts in articulations and dynamics at the same time as he enters notes. It is fast when he does it (about 40% faster, he says), but I have yet to make the conversion. Resistance to change? Obstinacy? I don't know. Maybe it's the order of things that confuses me in Simple. I am used to thinking pitch - then rhythmic value, and Speedy works that way. I don't think that's any more logical than the other way around, but I'm used to it.

I'm interested to see if anyone responds to this question differently.

Chuck


On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

I know this comes up every so often, but I wonder whether there are any true Speedy to Simple converts.

Are there people on this list, who would consider themselves to have been really quick in Speedy entry, but got converted to Simple after Simple was improved? Can Simple be as fast or faster than Speedy is when it is used by a competent note enterer?

Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to