Erg. Whatever. I think it's insane to wade through all the quotes/quotes
and more quotes to read something at the END of a message. If people
replied at the top to messages, you can still see the order of the
"conversation" and easily see what the person had to say.....
Isn't that what is more important, keeping the order of the conversation
intact?
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 12:52 PM 12/15/2006, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>Well, it doesn't make sense. Sites like Digg, Slashdot, MacDailyNews,
>MacNN.........Yahoo News.......
>
>All those have new items at the top. Doesn't it make sense then that
>messages and Blog and Email software work the same way?
No, it doesn't. An email thread is a conversation. You want to read
what someone said and then what the reply is. On blogs and news sites,
the articles are not related to one another in that way, and when you
go to the site you generally want to see the newest things first.
On the other hand, if you really like to see older things first, you
can use an RSS reader or aggregator to read your news and blogs. They
let you sort the items oldest first.
Aaron.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
