On Jan 13, 2007, at 9:49 PM, Carl Dershem wrote:

In many minds (the general public - the people who watch TV and occasionally go to movies, not the people who go to the opera), "Opera" is something big and grand and expensive that the 'hoity- toity' upper classes go to, or something the Marx Brothers might spoof, but real knowledge of opera is very limited. Even fairly well educated people can rarely name a half-dozen operas.

As is occasionally demonstrated on Jeopardy....

I think you're overstating when you exclude "people who go to opera" from those who perceive it as an upper-class experience. Having worked with several regional opera companies and having some idea of their marketing experience, I would say that a significant fraction of the operagoing audience does believe that opera is an upper-class taste. That's why they go.

The size of that fraction depends on the community -- it's particularly large in a company that serves a suburban area with a lot of nouveau riche and sufficiently distant from the dominant city of the area (eg, Walnut Creek vis-a-vis San Francisco); much less in an older community with a strong arts tradition (eg, Berkeley).

This segment of the audience is the one that wants to see nothing but Bohemes and Carmens and others from the limited core repertoire. They're also the ones who are least resistant to higher ticket prices (which, in a perverse way, they actually prefer, as it confirms their sense of being upper class).

(The same segment seems to care as much about a singer's resume as her demonstrated talent. They seem particularly impressed by a singer who comes from out of town, which explains why so many singers have to go somewhere else in order to get their careers kick-started. At one time when I was in SF I knew a singer who went to New York to sing a role at NYCO when in the very same season a singer of equal talent came from New York to sing the exact same role in SFO. Go figure.)

And opera "as it was" is little like what is played today. Advances/ changes in instruments, halls, and voice training (not to mention amplification) have changed the art so much that Mozart and Verdi and the like would be astonished by it.

True. And yet, I'm amazed how often opera fans -- and now I'm talking even of reasonably well-informed ones -- object to deviations from recent tradition by citing "authenticity".

mdl
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to