David W. Fenton wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 at 19:27, Eric Dannewitz wrote:

First, why do this people have old versions of Acrobat reader? I mean,
it is FREE....

Because some later versions suck. Acrobat 6 rendered better onscreen (with the smooth lines setting) than Acrobat 7. On the other hand, 7 is much faster. I have considered reverting to 6 to get better rendering, but the speed was really poor.

One basic principle is that newer software is simply not always better, and there are very good reasons for not upgrading.
True, but Acrobat seems to get better with every version. I never used version 7, but I used 6, and the current version, 8, is quite a bit faster on Mac OS X than Preview....

Would you really say that Finale 2007, despite its wonderful new features, is a problem-free upgrade from 2006? Would you really say that people should definitely upgrade, given that 2006 works and in many respects 2007 doesn't?
I would say that I would recommend people upgrade to 2007. The parts feature alone has saved me a ton of time.
Blaming it on the users is completely unfair. One has to live with these kinds of problems because there are perfect good and valid reasons for sticking with older software
Um. Ok. Not. Other than people with newer versions of the software cannot send stuff to you reliably. Case in point, Finale. You can't save in an older version format. You have to use Midi, or that XML program. Who wants to do that?
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to