Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's not just that it makes the "look like who aren't really that
interested in the public good" -- that is exactly what they are. Of
course, that makes them no different from any other corporation, but
some corporations are better at at least going through the motions of
pretending that they are interested in things other than the bottom
line, for the sake of their public image.
I hope people make a stink about this and I hope to hell it hurts UE.
But of course it won't since people who control programming for
orchestras as well as individual performers often think of specific
works they want to do and then get the music, as opposed to approaching
the vast available repertoire from the point of view of "gee, what neat
music can I discover?"
And since they'll pick the repertoire and then deal with whomever they
have to buy/rent it from, they'll deal with UE since it controls some
fine music.
Monopoly -- what a wonderful thing! (not!)
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
