How do we know Charpentier didn't accidentally forget the dot on the eight, and that those two 32nd notes aren't grace notes? Perhaps grace notes were not written that way at the time, I'm not sure.
On 19/04/2008, dc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > dhbailey écrit: > > > I'm split between notating it exactly as written and changing it to > > having the final two beats be: > > > > 8th, 16th, 16th-tied-to-dotted-8th, two 32nds > > > > Leaving it as written will cause a bit of confusion at first but will be > > less busy-looking, while the second way will be clearer at first but will > > always look much too busy for the sound. > > > > Those were of course my two ideas also. The fact that the note has an > ornament over it that fills its whole length prompts me to leave it as a > quarter note. I'm afraid breaking it down might be misleading: the ornament > could be interpreted as filling only the 16th. > > Thanks, David. > > Dennis > > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
