Given that you can't tell us what was tested, how it was tested or when
this was done, I don't know what it is a result OF, and so no, I don't
accept it at face value as proof of anything at all.
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 29 Jun 2009 at 6:40, Owain Sutton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
I don't know the study designs, nor do I know the nature of the
testing or the user population.
....
I don't get where this kind of statistical illiteracy comes from...
Wanting to know the basic details of a study before accepting an
assertion of results is statistical illiteracy?
Who is asking you to *accept* the results?
The studies are what they are. If you dispute them, do so.
Otherwise, you're just complaining about a result you don't like.
I'm agnostic one way or the other -- I don't care what the studies
say -- I'm just reporting.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
