On 30 Jan 2011 at 10:50, Jari Williamsson wrote:

> On 2011-01-29 23:35, David W. Fenton wrote:
> > I find spacing of multimeasure rests problematic -- they don't
> > respond to layout updates the way other measures do, and I find I
> > often have to set them manually. They are almost always too wide in
> > Finale's default spacing, but I don't know what rule I'd propose.
> 
> I think the default behaviour in Finale has always(?) been to set it
> to 360 EVPUs, regardless of how many measure rests.

I had never bothered to look, but I just noticed that the file I'm 
currently working on had its multimeasure rests set to a minimum 
width of 1.25", which is just way, way too wide! So, I've changed it 
to 0 and will be testing to see what it does. I'm hoping it allocates 
the minimum space needed to accommodate the rest symbol and number, 
and then I can adjust to make them wider as needed.

So, for me, the mystery of why they come out too wide is resolved!

-- 
David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to