Once of the great improvements in 2014 and higher is beat-attachment of smarts shapes (rather than measure attachment). Not only can you get more precise endpoints, you can unlink the endpoints in parts and edit them separately.
Another great improvement (with 2014) is that most of the special tools are unlinkable in parts. I think the choice of 14.5 over 12 is a no-brainer. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Raymond Horton <[email protected]> wrote: > 2014 .5 is good. 2012 is faster for very large files. Ymmv . Windows > > Raymond Horton > Composer, Arranger > Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) United Methodist Church > Retired Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra, 1971-2016 > > On Jul 1, 2016 3:29 PM, "Aaron Sherber" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've kept working in Fin2011 for several years, because it has met my > needs > > and because I haven't been working in Finale enough lately to figure out > a > > new version. But I've been having a few minor compatibility issues with > > Windows 10, so I think it's time to move on. > > > > I have both Fin2012 and Fin2014.5. Is 2014.5 sufficiently stable that I > can > > move to that version with no concerns, or am I better off just moving to > > 2012? > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron. > > _______________________________________________ > > Finale mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > > > To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: > > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: [email protected]
