According to James Youngman on 6/26/2007 2:20 PM:
> @@ -2025,7 +2026,7 @@ format_date (struct timespec ts, int kind)
> * demonstrating that the performance difference is actually
> * measurable.
> */
> - assert (sizeof(buf) >= LONGEST_HUMAN_READABLE);
> + verify_true (sizeof(buf) >= LONGEST_HUMAN_READABLE);
This change introduces a gcc warning:
pred.c: In function `format_date':
pred.c:2032: warning: statement with no effect
Either we need to explicitly cast it to void, or change to using verify()
instead of verify_true(). I'm doing the latter as follows, as part of my
patch to remove gcc compiler warnings.
Index: find/pred.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/findutils/findutils/find/pred.c,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -p -r1.102 pred.c
--- find/pred.c 30 Jun 2007 13:15:33 -0000 1.102
+++ find/pred.c 30 Jun 2007 19:32:27 -0000
@@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ format_date (struct timespec ts, int kin
* demonstrating that the performance difference is actually
* measurable.
*/
- verify_true (sizeof(buf) >= LONGEST_HUMAN_READABLE);
+ verify (sizeof(buf) >= LONGEST_HUMAN_READABLE);
charsprinted = 0;
need_ns_suffix = 0;
--
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Findutils-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/findutils-patches
