On Oct 26, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On Oct 26, 2004, at 5:40 AM, Holger Schulz wrote:
Am 22.10.2004 um 22:21 schrieb Alexander K. Hansen:
The default behavior is set by the list software--the current setup
was deliberately chosen. "Reply to all" just means 2 copies of some
messages and they're all supposed to be less than 40k.
I'm not sure if I understand that. My problem is, that on replying
the
reply mail goes to the sender only by default, not to the list. I'd
find it more useful to contact the whole list with answers and
further
questions. Is it possible to set a Reply-To field in the mails of
that
list? It seems to be possible in other lists I'm in.
And the answer is: it _can_ be done, but that's a matter for the list
administrator to set up.
I'm not sure how you read email, but I have a procmail filter that
uses formail to insert a Reply-To header. From my .procmailrc:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0 fhw
| formail -i "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
}
dan
And for people who use Mail.app, you can set one via Option-Command-R.
--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
