On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:28:45AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > Martin Costabel wrote: > [] > >But thirdly, the absence of Test::More does not (or did not for me, in > >any case) prevent the complete installation of the new fink. It was not > >treated as an error. > > I guess the errors that have been observed come up when some version of > test-simple-pmXXX is installed, but XXX does not correspond to the > installed perl version?
I have no idea. I based my suggestion on the observation that all the failed test suites use a Test::More invocation that is not supported by "some older versions" of "some of the Test::* modules" but I can't remember which. Nor can I remember which test-*-pm(560) supplies the right combination. Other perl-module packages use the same construct, so user will likely wind up installing these test-* eventually anyway. OTOH, we may as well fix the fink test...no reason for us to cause problems even if everyone else does. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list Fink-beginners@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
