Kevin Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> I believe that openoffice.org should get special treatment.  The  
> build takes, a very, very long time, and the last time I tried it  
> needed over 37 GB of disk space (I'm not sure how much disk space it  
> needs - my build attempt failed when the disk ran out of space).  I  
> did download the binary from http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ 
> ~asari/OpenOffice.org/, and it worked fine.  I suspect that many,  
> many more people will be able to use the binary than would be able to  
> compile it.
>
> I believe that openoffice.org should be released as a binary now.

>From what I've read in the oo.o package description file and on the
fink mailing lists, that package isn't ready for "stable" yet. I don't
know if the Todai team reads the fink-* lists regularly.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

Reply via email to